HomeR&D Credit › IRS Rules & Regs
The 2026 driver

IRS Rules, Form 6765 & the Code

The redesigned Form 6765 (Section G), the officer-compensation rules that trip up founders, and a full reference to the IRC, Treasury regulations, notices, and key cases behind the credit.

New for 2026

Form 6765 Section G is mandatory in 2026.

Detailed business-component reporting becomes required for most filers. Here’s who’s exempt, and a 30-second check for your situation.

Effective

Tax years beginning after Dec. 31, 2025 (2026 returns filed in 2027).

1
Qualified Small Business

You’re a QSB under IRC §41(h)(3) and check the box to claim the reduced payroll-tax credit.

OR
2
Small-Taxpayer Test

All three must be true:

  • Total QREs ≤ $1.5M (controlled-group level)
  • Gross receipts ≤ $50M (per §448(c)(3))
  • Claimed on an original filed return
Amended returns: the size exemption applies to timely original returns only. Amended claims need full Section G regardless of size.

Do I need to file Section G?

Based on the IRS guidelines for 2026 returns.
Are you a QSB electing the payroll-tax offset?
Total QREs (controlled-group level)
Average annual gross receipts (prior 3 yrs)
Filing on…
NO · EXEMPT
Meets the small-taxpayer exemption (all three conditions).
Want it on file anyway? Book a review →
Educational, not tax advice.
Section G — the new Form 6765

What Section G requires

🛡️ Who's exempt from Section G

QSBs electing the payroll tax credit; taxpayers with QREs ≤ $1.5M AND avg gross receipts ≤ $50M at the control-group level get reduced reporting. Many startup / SMB clients may qualify — worth flagging early.

⚠️ Amended returns — relevant now

On amended returns, taxpayers must list each business component, detail qualifying activities, and report QREs regardless of size — the exemptions don't apply. If you work amended returns, this is live today, not just a 2026 problem.

The 2026 driver

What this changes in client intake

Section G requires identifying each business component — any product, process, software, technique, formula, or invention researched — with wages split by activity type and real records behind them.

What we now collectWhy it matters
Project list with QRE amounts per projectNot just total wages — component-level dollars.
Employee role classification per projectDirect researcher, supervisor, or support.
Time allocation per project per employeeAt minimum, reasonable estimates with a documented methodology.
Supplies & contractors tied to specific projectsNot just a general R&D pooled cost.
Consistent naming conventions & project codesStreamlines reporting across every downstream system.

Why the General Ledger is the source of truth

Form 6765 is the flag, not the evidence. The W-2 shows total comp; the return aggregates. Neither tells you which dollars were research-related — the GL, especially with project codes or cost centers, is the source-document layer between the 6765 totals and the underlying records.

1 · Isolate research wages

An employee might spend 60% on qualified research and 40% on maintenance. The GL — with project codes / cost centers — shows what was coded to R&D vs. operations. Without it, the IRS can argue your wage allocation is a guess.

2 · Identify supply expenses

Cloud computing, lab materials, and testing environments are QREs too — but they live in expense accounts (software subscriptions, COGS), not on a W-2 or return line. You can't claim them without tracing them.

3 · Capture contract research

Payments to third-party developers / researchers appear as vendor payments. Returns aggregate these; the GL breaks them out by vendor and date, letting you tie specific contractor work to specific projects.

C-Corp officer compensation

Officers, wages & documentation

Do officers have to be on payroll to be an officer? No — officer status is a corporate-law matter (DGCL §142 / board appointment via bylaws). But only W-2 wages (IRC §3401(a)) qualify as QREs. An officer with equity-only compensation generates zero R&D credit benefit, no matter how much qualified research they perform.
ScenarioOn payroll?QRE eligible?Notes
CEO / Founder — coding, W-2 wages paidYESYES — time-apportionedDocument % of time on QRAs per project.
CTO on payroll, full-time R&DYESYES — up to 100%≥80% QRA time = 100% wages qualify (substantially all).
CEO — admin / sales only (W-2)YESPARTIAL onlyDual-function rule — only the R&D portion qualifies.
Officer — equity only, no payrollNONONo W-2 = no QRE. Equity compensation is not a wage.
Officer — deferred comp (not yet paid)NO (deferred)NO until paidQREs recognized when W-2 wages are actually paid.
NSO exercise — W-2 spread at exerciseYES (W-2)YES — if QRA performedNSO spread is W-2 income → QRE eligible if time documented.
ISO exercise — no W-2 at exerciseYES (cash only)Cash wages onlyISO exercise creates no W-2 → zero incremental QRE benefit.
Non-employee Board DirectorNONODirectors' fees (1099-NEC) are not W-2 wages — not QRE.
✦ Planning example: CTO at $300K, 90% time on QRAs → $270K QRE wages → $37,800 federal credit at 14% ASC → directly offsets payroll taxes. Support with contemporaneous project-level timesheets, board resolutions documenting technical duties, offer letters specifying R&D responsibilities, and GitHub / engineering logs.
ASC vs. Regular Method

Two ways to compute the credit

ASC — Alternative Simplified Credit
14%

of excess QREs over the base

Base: 50% of average QREs from the prior 3 tax years.

(Current-yr QREs − 50% × avg prior-3yr QREs) × 14%
  • No prior QRE history → flat 6% of current-year QREs
  • No historical records needed beyond 3 years
  • Lower admin burden — predictable and defensible
Regular Method
20%

of QREs exceeding the base amount

Base: fixed-base % × avg gross receipts from prior 4 years.

Fixed-base % from 1984–1988 QREs & gross receipts (or startup rules)
  • Higher rate, but the base is usually higher too
  • Wins when QREs were historically low but have grown
  • Requires 1984–1988 data — rarely accessible
Rule of thumb: for most startups and growth-stage companies, ASC wins (no 1984–88 data exists). Sophisticated taxpayers compute both and take the larger.
Base period

When a base-period calculation is actually required

Whether a base-period calculation runs depends entirely on the method you choose.

⚖️ Regular Method

Yes — base period required.

Fixed-base percentage from 1984–1988 QREs and gross receipts (or a startup period if the company didn't exist then). Genuinely burdensome — the main reason most companies avoid it.

✅ ASC

No historical base period needed.

Uses average QREs from the prior 3 tax years × 50% as the base amount. That's it — much cleaner, which is why it fits most startup profiles.

IRC §41(d) — the four-part test

Does the work qualify?

Every claimed business component must satisfy all four tests. Contemporaneous documentation is critical.

01

Technological in Nature

Must rely on hard sciences — engineering, physical/biological/computer science, or mathematics. Social sciences do NOT qualify.

02

Permitted Purpose

Must develop a new or improved business component — product, process, software, technique, formula, or invention.

03

Technological Uncertainty

Uncertainty must exist at the outset regarding capability, methodology, or appropriate design.

04

Process of Experimentation

Must evaluate alternatives via modeling, simulation, or systematic trial and error. GitHub commits, lab logs, and design iterations all help.

Wages — per component

Wages split three ways

Under the new Form 6765, wages for each component break into three buckets — and the distinctions are exam-tested.

👥 Direct research

The person actually doing the qualified work — hands on the experiment, the code, the design.

⚖️ Direct supervision

First-line management of qualified research (e.g. a scientist supervising lab experiments). Does NOT include higher-level managers supervising the first-line managers.

⚙️ Direct support

Services enabling the research — a lab tech cleaning equipment used in qualified research, or a clerk compiling research data.

Intake implication: a single "total R&D wages" figure is no longer enough. Wages must be classified by role, by component, with a documented time-allocation methodology behind every split.
QRE categories

Qualified Research Expenses (IRC §41(b))

QRE typeIRC referenceNotes for startups
In-house W-2 wages§41(b)(2)(A)Primary QRE. Must time-track by project. Includes direct, supervisory, and support employees.
Supply costs§41(b)(2)(C)Materials consumed in research. NOT capital equipment. Prototype materials qualify.
Contract research (65% rule)§41(b)(3)65% of amounts paid to non-employees for qualified research. Company must retain substantial rights.
Legislation reference

IRC code, Treasury regs, IRS guidance & key cases

IRC §41 — core provisions
§41(a)Credit amount — 20% RC / 14% ASC
§41(b)Qualified Research Expenses (QREs)
§41(b)(2)(A)W-2 wages — in-house employee research
§41(b)(3)Contract research — 65% rule
§41(c)Base amount computation
§41(d)Four-Part Test — qualified research
§41(d)(4)Exclusions from qualified research
§41(f)(1)Aggregation — controlled group rules
§41(h)QSB Payroll Tax Offset (PATH Act)
§3920-year carryforward for unused credits
§52Controlled group cross-reference (>50%)
§174Mandatory R&E capitalization (TCJA 2022)
§280C(c)Reduced deduction election
§3111(a)6.2% employer SS tax — the offset target
§3121(d)(1)Officers who perform services = employees
§3401(a)Wages definition — QRE eligibility
§162(a)(1)Reasonable officer compensation standard
§162(m)$1M cap — PUBLIC companies ONLY
§65113-yr refund / 941-X statute of limitations
Regulations, notices & key cases
Reg. §1.41-2QRE definitions and exclusions
Reg. §1.41-44-Part Test analysis & examples
Reg. §1.41-4(d)Contemporaneous records requirement
Reg. §1.41-6Controlled group aggregation rules
Reg. §1.41-8(b)Payroll offset election — irrevocable
Reg. §31.3121(d)-1(b)Minor services — officer not employee
IRS Notice 2017-23Form 8974 guidance — payroll offset
IRS Notice 2023-63§174 TCJA transition guidance
Rev. Proc. 2000-50Computer software development rules
Rev. Proc. 2023-8§174 accounting method change
PATH Act (P.L. 114-113)Created §41(h) payroll offset — 2015
TCJA (P.L. 115-97, 2017)§174 mandatory amortization from 2022
SECURE 2.0 (P.L. 117-328)Raised offset cap to $500K; Medicare opt.
Suder v. Comm'r (T.C. 2014)Software qualifies; documentation required
Siemer Milling (T.C. 2019)Process of experimentation evidence key
Cohan Rule (2d Cir. 1930)Estimates allowed with imperfect records
IRC §6656FTD penalties — don't under-deposit
IRC §381Credit carryover in M&A / reorganizations
Reg. §1.41-0Master index of all §41 regulations

Book Your Free Call

Get Your Free R&D
Tax Credit Assessment

30 minutes with our experts to find out exactly how much R&D credit your business qualifies for — at no cost, no obligation.

MainStreet
Book Your Free Discovery Call